Sunday, April 26, 2009

GALA SEASON!!!

IT’S GALA SEASON FOR THE HEALTH “ADVOCATES”. My, my. Isn’t that Nice? Especially because of all the awards they are giving out. Who is getting them? Each other of course! Who is not? Tara Parker-Pope. She wrote “Voice of Lung Cancer,” for the April 22 New York Times. Lesley Alderman. She wrote When Medical Bills Outpace Your Means, Seize Control Swiftly, for the April 24 Times. These are just two of the people who will not get awards for not babbling the Paterson-Obama line. Instead they are doing the hard work: reporting on what is actually going on. Are we hearing anything specific from on high about how the people being driven into bankruptcy by health insurance and health care costs are going to be helped by ObamaCare? Are we hearing anything about the people with politically incorrect cancer and other unpopular diseases and what ObamaCare is going to do for them? Ssshhh. Listen hard. You won’t hear anything. But want to know about Preventatatatative Community Care? Buy a Gala Ticket and find out.

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/22/voices-of-lung-cancer/

LUNG CANCER

April 22, 2009, 4:46 pm
Voices of Lung Cancer
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/22/voices-of-lung-cancer/

Lung cancer is the biggest cancer killer in the country, killing more than 160,000 people a year. Yet the disease remains low on the list of cancer funding priorities. In 2006, the National Cancer Institute spent $1,518 for each new case of lung cancer and $1,630 for each lung cancer death. By comparison, the agency spent $13,452 per death on breast cancer, which takes 41,000 lives annually.

Patients with lung cancer are well aware of the disparity in spending and sympathy, an issue addressed in the latest Patient Voices series by my colleague Karen Barrow.

“Because lung cancer is associated with smoking, there’s a stigma that makes it a much less sympathetic disease,” said Dr. Lisa Wood of Guilford, Conn., who was diagnosed last year with late-stage lung cancer.

Part of the problem is that lung cancer is often so deadly, patients don’t have the opportunity to become activists for their disease, said Jerrold Dash, 35, a nonsmoker who received a double lung transplant after developing the illness.

“A lot of lung cancer survivors don’t make it past five years, so there aren’t many voices to speak up like the other cancers,” Mr. Dash said. “I find myself always having to answer the questions: Did you smoke? How long did you smoke? Did you work in a coal mine? Every answer I give them is no.”

Click on this link to hear all the voices of lung cancer.

Let's Have Another Summit!

Arthur Springer, on April 26th, 2009 at 3:05 am

Letter to the Editor, The Times-News, Cumberland, MD
re the Fifth Annual Western Maryland Democratic Summit, 4/25/09
Your health summit is like all the other health summits: phony.
I am a Democrat but I have to say that the White House and the Democratic Party are rigging these meetings — the one at the White House on March 5 and all the others since. They all sound the same, say the same and are the same: Let’s have a miracle! Let’s get rid of all the sick people and use the money we would waste on them for Preventatatatative Care. What an Idea! What a scam! Let’s just set up one big managed care plan! And then let’s just shoot the wounded! How’s that for a Plan?

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Another sleeper about PREVENTION!!!!

The Huffington Post 4/21/2009
Dr. Agatston, it's a little late for this kind of thing. You don't understand what is going on. Or maybe you do. The HMOs are carrying on a huge campaign about "prevention" in order to disguise the fact that they want to defund services for people with chronic or disabling conditions and shift the money into their own pockets. Nobody is against "prevention." Nobody is against doing something about obesity and all obesity-related health problems. What we should be against is HMO greed and fraud. What we should be against is a revolting lobbying campaign to paint all sick people as irresponsible, to blame for their own health problems, and needing the heavy-handed ministrations of HMO gatekeepers who don't know squat about this problem. My state is full of this crap from the governor on down and we don't need any more. I would suggest that if you want to separate yourself from this scam, just tell us how much you want to raise your reimbursement rates for nutritional counseling and whether or not you will hire skilled nutritionists to do the counseling you haven't been taught to do. I know what that is because I have such a counselor. If it sounds reasonable, you'll get support. If not, you won't. It's a little late in the game for anything else, for drivel about "prevention," for HMO scams. Get with it or get lost.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

See the electronic health record?

The internet hackers see it too!

Surprise! We already have electronic health records. And so does every internet hacker.

And guess what? Insurance companies are using them to create more paperwork to delay and deny health care! Gwiz. Wow. Yawn. Hello! Anyone home upstairs?
========================================================================================
http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-fg-philippines-transcribe19-2009apr19,0,3101962,full.story

A trainee in Manila tries to decipher an American doctor’s dictation. U.S. healthcare providers outsource billions of lines of transcription work each year to low-paid workers across Asia.
Americans' medical files go digital, by way of Asia
Paul Watson / Los Angeles Times
Low-paid transcriptionists in the Philippines, India and elsewhere are helping to keep the huge U.S. healthcare bureaucracy running.
By Paul Watson
April 19, 2009 -- Los Angeles Times

Reporting from Manila -- It started out as just another Thanksgiving Day stomachache, a nagging pain that sharpened until it reverberated from California halfway around the world.

When the ache in her lower right abdomen became excruciating, the twentysomething woman was rushed to a surgery center, where the doctor diagnosed a ruptured appendix.

The woman needed an operation -- fast. But before the surgeon could wheel her into the operating theater, he had to find out whether the patient's insurance company would pay. That meant paperwork: An examination report had to be dictated, typed up and submitted to her insurer for approval.

So while the woman waited in agony, her doctor dialed an 800 number. An electronically perky voice invited the surgeon to press 2 if he was ready to start.

The instant he hung up a few minutes later, a digitized recording raced through fiber-optic cables on the Pacific Ocean seabed and into a computer server on the 17th floor of a Manila office tower, where medical school graduate Dinah Barrete was working the graveyard shift.

Ear-bud headphones plugged in, she tapped a pedal to start the doctor's voice file and began typing. Her transcription of his report was on its way to him via the Internet in 15 minutes, as quickly as though the work had been done just down the hall, but much cheaper.

So goes the global traffic in Americans' intimate health information.

In a startling illustration of the life-or-death decisions involving low-paid workers thousands of miles away in today's globalized world, Americans' most personal details move 24 hours a day as U.S. healthcare providers outsource billions of lines of transcription work each year to offices across Asia in a bid to cut the massive cost of medical bureaucracy.

"It's a cyberspace miracle every time it's done," said Fred J. Kumetz, a Beverly Hills lawyer who founded and runs EData Services, one of the biggest companies transcribing U.S. medical records in the Philippines.

From dictated summaries of routine checkups to complete recordings of conversations between surgeons and nurses in operating theaters, the foreign workers are transforming the digital audio files into the documents that tell Americans' medical histories.

Most of the work is done for 10 to 15 cents a line in less than 24 hours. But the cost can be 300 times that for "stat," or immediate, orders, such as when a doctor needs a transcript of an emergency medical team's radio report before its helicopter lands with a patient.

Regardless of the price, the process is largely the same. Audio files dispatched across the Internet are transcribed and the text is fired back to the U.S. to meet government demands for a shift to electronic medical records.

Before broadband connections made it easy to outsource office work in the 1990s, Americans typed out medical records and the cost of healthcare bureaucracy steadily ballooned.

Now thousands of low-paid workers in countries such as India, the Philippines and Pakistan work in offices that never close, churning out massive amounts of U.S. medical records.

Tapping feverishly at keyboards in front of row upon row of computer screens, Asian transcriptionists often strain to understand what American doctors have dictated through phone lines or into digital recorders.

Other typists work under similar pressure to keep up with the demand to transfer decades-old medical documents from paper into computer files to help complete the record-keeping revolution envisaged by President Obama.

A big business

The Philippines hopes to reap big profits from his multibillion-dollar push to computerize health records.

The business of transcribing American medical files employed 34,000 Filipinos and generated $476 million in revenue last year, said Ernesto Herrera, a former senator who heads the Trade Union Congress of the Philippines. He expects the number of transcriptionists to more than triple, and annual billings to jump to more than $1.7 billion, by the end of next year.

"Outsourcing is unavoidable, because the cost in the U.S. is just too high," Herrera said. Filipinos can beat Indians in the race for medical transcription work from the U.S. because, as a former American colony, the Philippines is more familiar with American accents, Herrera said. This country also has a vast pool of jobless medical workers who need little additional training to take dictation from American doctors, he said.

"Right now, we have about 400,000 licensed nurses who are unemployed in the Philippines," Herrera said.

EData's Manila office never closes, and the video camera watching over scores of Filipinos working at computer terminals 24/7 never blinks. It's connected to the Internet so American clients can peep in on the operation whenever they want.

High on one wall, a row of clocks tick off the time in Los Angeles, New York and Denver, as young doctors sit at double-screen computer terminals reviewing Americans' medical insurance claims, performing one of EData's other specialties.

But most of the workers in the long office are typing records from recorded dictation or conversations that constantly stream into the company's computer server. As they listen, transcriptionists pick up hints of how swamped some American doctors are by medical bureaucracy, which follows them everywhere.

"We've had a doctor dictate in a zoo," said Barrete, a transcriptionist and executive vice president with EData. "We could hear the elephant, so where else could she be?"

Transcript editors are usually doctors, who sometimes pick up errors in American physicians' dictation, even what they suspect are misdiagnoses, as they check for typos. Unless clients give permission to correct the mistakes, they stay in the text, usually in italics, to make sure the transcript is verbatim, said Danilo Navarro, executive vice president of Xynet Communication Solutions Inc., which transcribes about 4 million lines of American medical files a month.

The same goes for any cursing, jokes, fishing stories, flirting or the odd "Oops!" that transcriptionists hear in recordings of operating theater chatter, he said.

India takes the largest share of outsourced U.S. medical transcription work. But it faces growing competition from the Philippines, Pakistan and Caribbean countries as American doctors, hospitals and insurers come under increasing pressure to reduce the cost of keeping records.

Jobs for Americans

Outsourcing isn't expected to harm job prospects for American transcriptionists, because there is so much work to be done, said a report by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. About 101,000 Americans were employed as medical transcriptionists in 2002, according to the bureau. Most were women, many of them working from home. By 2006, the number had dropped to 98,000 as high-speed Internet connections allowed companies to outsource more of the work.

But the bureau estimates that the number of American medical transcriptionists will grow 14% by 2016, faster than the average for other jobs.

The median income for American transcriptionists is $31,250 a year. In the Philippines, a fast one paid by the line can earn about $6,000 annually, or three times a nurse's salary, Herrera said.

The profession's stars earn as much as 300 times the regular rate doing the less frequent, but high-pressure, job of transcribing radio traffic between medevac helicopters and hospitals, Navarro said.

Even if new technology automates more transcription, Navarro said, there is a backlog of about 40 years of American medical files waiting to be typed into computer files, work that could keep legions of foreign workers at keyboards for years.

Paying by ear

His company also trains transcriptionists and turned out 550 graduates last year. Training takes six months to two years, but that's not fast enough for some firms. They are so desperate for staff to handle new American clients that they are poaching their competitors' best workers.

Transcriptionists with the best ear for accents, or different physicians' speaking quirks, are in highest demand, and cause the most disruption when they jump ship. When doctors are difficult to understand, Navarro assigns people to specialize in transcribing them.

For an especially baffling physician's dictation, Navarro has two backup transcriptionists ready in case the lead specialist gets sick.

"Editors normally cannot do miracles," he said. "Whenever the production manager sees a challenging file in the queue, he shouts, 'OK, Rita, clear your desk. Dr. X is coming!' "

paul.watson@latimes.com
Copyright 2009 Los Angeles Times

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Dear Ozark:

• A guy named Ozark jumped all over me in TruthDig for punching out Ellen Goodman and the evil family docs. You can read it at http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090401_the_care_in_health_care/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
• I am not going to get dragged down into your Stuff Ozark. I do not write hit pieces for a living. I do it for sheer enjoyment and for delight in truth. This is for anyone else who may have misunderstood:

1) Nonsense is for Ellen Goodman who is peddling the media rap of the week.

2) I am a frequent flyer in the health care system in New York, so I know when someone hasn’t a clue about what’s actually going on and is merely repeating whatever Stuff they have heard. People are making a lot of money for that lately.
The money is coming from medical services that take care of sick people. And the plan is to finish the hit job the HMOs have been doing on the real docs and the public for too many years.

3) I have nothing against “family” doctors who practice within bounds. I have a problem with the fams who don’t like their limits and won’t recognize them. New York has laws about that and the fams violate them constantly in a propaganda campaign designed to brainwash the public into thinking the fams are the ultimate MDs. On the way home from a meeting trashing the people I consider to be the good guys, I once asked a fam how famdocs differed from plain general practitioners. She got very angry, foamed at the mouth briefly, then said “I SEND POSTCARDS TO MY PATIENTS IN OCTOBER REMINDING THEM TO GET FLU SHOTS!” (wow ... and what do you do the rest of the year?)

4) I am definitely part of the specialist medical conspiracy to keep people alive and well despite bad genes, bad luck, bad habits and age. I am very connected to specialists. Seven of them to be precise. They are all board-certified in internal medicine and also in one or more specialties. Things like cardiology, infectious disease, gastroenterology, ophthalmological surgery, psychopharmacology and endocrinology. One of them is my principal .. not primary .. care provider . She is triply credentialed: internal, pulmonary and critical care.

The lack of respect shown to these people by the HMOs is really quite amazing. They end up treating many patients free when these patents can’t get referrals or revisits from their HMOs. My PCP (principal care provider) does not get paid for keeping up with me, let alone with what my other six docs are doing. And they do not get paid for keeping up with her. I fired all the others long ago. I assume they are back in the Slow Class.

5) At this particular time, we here in the US are in a considerable and unavoidable political battle. I respect my enemies for what they are, and they had better respect me too. A few special interests are trying to keep control of the system they have dominated for so long. But they can’t. Because this is about universal health care. Equality, Fairness. Equity. Diversity. Pluralism. Democracy. The special interests, including the unethical family docs, are going to lose. Lose big. If you can’t stand the heat, Ozark, get out of the kitchen.

Labels:

Woe to Ellen Goodman

Re Putting the ‘Care’ in Health Care
by Ellen Goodman Boston Globe/Washington Post

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090401_the_care_in_health_care/#

Posted on Apr 2, 2009

----------------------------------------
Nonsense. It is sad to see that people who should know better are being duped by HMO lobby propaganda at just the time when we need the best critical minds in the country to help define what health care "reform" should really mean.

It should not mean coercive, regressive, authoritarian managed care for the poor and the middle class while the political class retains its privileges. It should not mean the abuse of power by the kinds of special interests who dominated the White House forum on health care reform.

It should not mean cartoons and caricatures of people who have more education, experience and expertise while those who know and do less are worshipped.

It should not mean ridicule and lies about modern technology while every chiropractic, "holistic," supplement industry, 11th Century scam is treated with kid gloves.

It should not mean one-size-fits-all oxcart medicine at the expense of those who need something other than managed primary care -- those with emergency, acute, catastrophic, chronic, disabling or rare health problems.

It should not mean delusions about "prevention." People get sick. People inherit bad genes. People have accidents and bad habits.

The philosophy of the Luddites has little or nothing to offer.

We need health care that is truly comprehensive in fact, not merely in rhetoric. We need access to secondary, tertiary, quaternary and quintenary care when we need such expertise, not voodoo by "gatekeepers" worshipped because they are in over their heads, don't know what they are doing and are singing a happy little song instead.

You want hand-holding? Go to your local palmist, your mother, your spouse, your best friend. I'll take 21st Century medicine.

Yes it does cost. So does life. There are germs out there, kiddies. Watch your butt.

Arthur Springer
MAP/EIP/Part D Program Participant
& Lay Advocate for People With Disabilities
150 W. 80th St. -- 4A
New York, NY 10024-6313
voice & fax: 212-580-9143
as99@verizon.net
Nothing about us without us

Thursday, April 2, 2009

How long, O Lord? How long?
Friday 3 April 2009


In pouring over tons of health policy stuff over the years I am amused and saddened by the consistent failure of all the PhDs and JDs to say anything about waiting times for appointments as a gold standard barometer for evaluation of health care quality. But when did these highpriced “advocates” ever have anything useful to tell us about quality?

I am on a rare diseases networking site where a woman in Ontario Canada with a serious endocrinology problem has just reported

“Most of the endocrinologists here have a wait time of 5 months.”

This was not concocted by some right wing think tank demonized by the far left and the “family” doctors. It was written last night by a perfectly ordinary and desperate person an Email away.

My own wait in January for a rare disease doctor to replace an assembly-line mutt who had declared me a lost cause was about a week ... standard at academic medical centers in New York City for access to world class MDs by people with traditional Medicaid.

Expecting the worst, the first question I asked his senior RN was
Does he take Medicaid? “Yes.”
Which of his fellows in training will I see and will that trainee do the surgery?
“You will see the doctor. He does all his surgery.”
And he did, with total success, ten days later.

The longer the health reformers in the US ignore these realities and continue to promote lowest common denominator health “plans” ... single payer, Conyers, “community” clinics, heavy-handed Preventative Primary Managed Care etc... the more likely it is that the reform process will grind to an even longer halt than the halt that has occurred already. (The latest is that the Sebelius nomination has been stalled for another two weeks by a Republican Senator’s objection.)

The “advocates” just cannot get it through their etc that they will not be able to preserve the privileges of their own political class while imposing a regressive program on others.

As more people begin to smell the all-too-familiar stench of politically correct “reform,” any and all of these proposals will sink into the mud. No amount of lies of the left about The Canadian System will work. No amount of caterwauling about asthma, diabetes and mammograms will cut the ice, let alone the mustard.

People will not agree to covering the uninsured by having their current coverage downgraded, no matter what the cost. The coalition of Paterson sycophants and HMO interests in NY can get away with it today. But woe to them tomorrow. Period. The sooner the “advocates” get it, the better for all of us.

Labels: